Mark Borchert

121 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Mark Borchert
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Ophthalmology 859
  • Neurology 598
  • Epidemiology 1.1k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 546
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 575
Replace Byron L. Lam with:
Byron L. Lam United States
Daniel M. Schwartz United States
Michihiko Sone Japan
Glen A. Gole Australia
Richard A. Harrad United Kingdom
Jun Shinoda Japan
Sara Llufriú Spain
M. Clanet France
Kshitij Mankad United Kingdom
Liang Xu China
Mark Borchert relative to Byron L. Lam United States Byron L. Lam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Byron L. Lam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Borchert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Borchert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Borchert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Borchert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Borchert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Borchert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Borchert. The network helps show where Mark Borchert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Borchert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Borchert Line = papers co-authored together Mark Borchert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013261
2 1987202
3 1999202
4 2013160
5 2011148
6 2002129
7 2009114
8 2021108
9 201196
10 199996
11 201291
12 200884
13 202079
14 201075
15 200072
16 201171
17 201070
18 200964
19 199664
20 200663

About Mark Borchert

Mark Borchert is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 128 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (29 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (8 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (859 citations), Neurology (598 citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (546 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (575 citations). Mark Borchert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susan A. Cotter, Kristina Tarczy‐Hornoch, Rohit Varma, Ge Wen, Pamela C. Garcia-Filion, Roberta McKean‐Cowdin, Stanley P. Azen, Melinda Y. Chang, Jesse H. Lin and Cassandra Fink. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Documenta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact