David Easdown

37 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

David Easdown
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 66
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 230
  • Algebra and Number Theory 16
  • Geometry and Topology 20
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
Replace R. McFadden with:
R. McFadden United States
Bret R. Tilson United States
Andrzej Kisielewicz Poland
Keresztély Corrádi Hungary
Robert D. Gray United Kingdom
Erkko Lehtonen Luxembourg
Olexandr Ganyushkin Ukraine
Peter R. Jones United States
В. А. Горбунов Russia
Florian Pfender United States
David Easdown relative to R. McFadden United States R. McFadden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
R. McFadden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Easdown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Easdown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Easdown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Easdown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Easdown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Easdown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Easdown. The network helps show where David Easdown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Easdown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Easdown Line = papers co-authored together David Easdown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198544
2 198834
3 200326
4 198420
5 200819
6
Presentations of Factorizable Inverse Monoids
200516
7 198413
8 199513
9 198412
10 198410
11 200410
12 19878
13 19938
14 20108
15 19847
16 19967
17 20096
18 20035
19 19884
20 19884

About David Easdown

David Easdown is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Modeling and Simulation, Algebra and Number Theory and Education, having authored 39 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (27 papers), Mathematics Education and Programs (4 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers), Mathematics Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (66 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (230 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (16 citations), Geometry and Topology (20 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). David Easdown has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl E. Praeger, D. G. FitzGerald, James East, Walter Douglas Munn, T. E. Hall, Victoria A. R. Gould, Mark Valentinovich Sapir, Mikhail Vladimirovich Volkov, George S. Papadopoulos and Mohan S. Putcha. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society and Journal of Group Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact