David E. Reed

88 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

David E. Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 26
  • Electrochemistry 125
  • Bioengineering 42
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Inorganic Chemistry 58
Replace Michael C. Hughes with:
Michael C. Hughes United States
Bin Yin China
Mary McNamara United States
Atul Sharma United States
Mengqian Li China
Cheng Cao China
Mihir Ghosh India
Christos Christodoulou Greece
Suzanne Bell United States
Kathleen O’Connell United States
David E. Reed relative to Michael C. Hughes United States Michael C. Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michael C. Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Reed. The network helps show where David E. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Reed Line = papers co-authored together David E. Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987118
2 202238
3 198438
4 201129
5 201123
6 198523
7 200422
8 198822
9 198822
10 202219
11 199619
12 202318
13 197118
14 201817
15 196017
16 201516
17 198914
18 198913
19 202011
20 202311

About David E. Reed

David E. Reed is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Social Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and Pharmacology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (4 papers) and Wireless Communication Networks Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (26 citations), Electrochemistry (125 citations), Bioengineering (42 citations), Clinical Psychology (88 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (58 citations). David E. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fred M. Hawkridge, M.A. Wickert, James Terner, Colin Eaborn, Robert E. Wickham, L. H. Klemm, Marc Champagne, John F. MacGregor, Klaus J. Roghmann and Marion Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Medical Care, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Pain Medicine and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact