David E. Kemp

3.9k citations
72 papers · 2.7k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Kemp

67 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

David E. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Biological Psychiatry 426
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 124
  • Neurology 127
  • Clinical Psychology 322
Replace K. N. Roy Chengappa with:
K. N. Roy Chengappa United States
Jakub Z. Konarski Canada
Jaspreet S. Brar United States
Iría Grande Spain
Eva Z. Reininghaus Austria
Hanna O. Woldeyohannes Canada
Olli Kampman Finland
Sheng-Yu Lee Taiwan
Outi Mantere Finland
Maurício Kunz Brazil
David E. Kemp relative to K. N. Roy Chengappa United States K. N. Roy Chengappa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
K. N. Roy Chengappa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Kemp. The network helps show where David E. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together David E. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009444
2 2010179
3 2008153
4 2010149
5 2009111
6 2007104
7 201492
8 201192
9 200876
10 200867
11 201066
12 201362
13 201054
14 201449
15 201045
16 201042
17 201337
18
Predictors of bipolar disorder risk among patients currently treated for major depression.
200637
19 200737
20 201236

About David E. Kemp

David E. Kemp is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Applied Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (39 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (426 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (124 citations), Neurology (127 citations) and Clinical Psychology (322 citations). David E. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Calabrese, Keming Gao, Stephen J. Ganocy, Roger S. McIntyre, Joanna K. Soczynska, Benjamin I. Goldstein, Robert L. Findling, Carla Conroy, Philip K. Chan and David J. Muzina. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Current Psychiatry Reports, Bipolar Disorders and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact