David E. Kemp

4.0k citations
85 papers · 3.2k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Kemp

80 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

David E. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Biological Psychiatry 481
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 135
  • Clinical Psychology 379
  • Neurology 145
Replace K. N. Roy Chengappa with:
K. N. Roy Chengappa United States
Jakub Z. Konarski Canada
Jaspreet Singh Brar United States
Hanna O. Woldeyohannes Canada
Mohammad T. Alsuwaidan Canada
Iría Grande Spain
Robert M. Post United States
Maurício Kunz Brazil
Clemente García‐Rizo Spain
Miquel Bioque Spain
David E. Kemp relative to K. N. Roy Chengappa United States K. N. Roy Chengappa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
K. N. Roy Chengappa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Kemp. The network helps show where David E. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together David E. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009451
2 2010185
3 2008167
4 2010154
5 2007116
6 2009113
7 201495
8 201192
9 201484
10 200879
11 201369
12 200868
13 201068
14 201665
15 201365
16 201054
17 201051
18 201550
19 201450
20 201044

About David E. Kemp

David E. Kemp is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Applied Psychology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (50 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (8 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (481 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.9k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (135 citations), Clinical Psychology (379 citations) and Neurology (145 citations). David E. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Calabrese, Keming Gao, Stephen J. Ganocy, Roger S. McIntyre, Joanna K. Soczynska, Benjamin I. Goldstein, Robert L. Findling, Carla M. Conroy, Philip K. Chan and David J. Muzina. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Bipolar Disorders and Psychopharmacology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact