David D. Mott

3.3k citations
46 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

David D. Mott

46 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

David D. Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 869
  • Neurology 339
  • Developmental Neuroscience 151
  • Biological Psychiatry 70
Replace Gloria E. Meredith with:
Gloria E. Meredith United States
Morten S. Jensen Denmark
Mario F. Pozza Switzerland
Giannina Descalzi Canada
Haruyuki Kamiya Japan
Joseph Glykys United States
Isao Ito Japan
Miho Terunuma United States
Timothy M. DeLorey United States
Robert P. Yasuda United States
David D. Mott relative to Gloria E. Meredith United States Gloria E. Meredith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gloria E. Meredith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David D. Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David D. Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David D. Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David D. Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David D. Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David D. Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David D. Mott. The network helps show where David D. Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David D. Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David D. Mott Line = papers co-authored together David D. Mott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991249
2 2015232
3 1994208
4 1998188
5 2016119
6 1991118
7 2011109
8 1997101
9 198995
10 199091
11 199389
12 200371
13 201265
14 199363
15 199660
16 200859
17 201155
18 200142
19 201239
20 199038

About David D. Mott

David D. Mott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (39 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (17 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (16 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (13 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (869 citations), Neurology (339 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (151 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (70 citations). David D. Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Darrell V. Lewis, W. A. Wilson, Raymond Dingledine, Janet L. Fisher, Alexander J. McDonald, H. Scott Swartzwelder, Sunan Zhang, Mark Washburn, Emily M. Stanley and Jim R. Fadel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research, The Journal of Physiology and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact