David Chaikin
Impact in
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Corruption and Economic Development
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Information Systems top 10%
- Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Digital and Cyber Forensics
Papers in
-
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 13
- Corruption and Economic Development 9
- Co-authors
- J. C. Sharman (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Crime Law and Social Change (1 paper)Governance (1 paper)Criminal Law Forum (1 paper)Journal of Financial Crime (2 papers)Melbourne University law review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
David Chaikin
20 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Sociology and Political Science 209
- Information Systems 74
- Accounting 31
- Finance 18
- Strategy and Management 26
Countries citing papers authored by David Chaikin
This map shows the geographic impact of David Chaikin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Chaikin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Chaikin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Chaikin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Chaikin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Chaikin. The network helps show where David Chaikin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside David Chaikin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 6 | Corruption and Money Laundering: A Symbiotic Relationship | 2017 | 21 |
| 7 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 9 | International anti-money laundering laws. Improving external accountability of political leaders | 2010 | 6 |
| 10 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 13 | Risk-Based Approaches to Combating Financial Crime | 2009 | 5 |
| 14 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 16 | Adapting the Qualifications to the Banker's Common Law Duty of Confidentiality to Fight Transnational Crime | 2011 | 2 |
| 17 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 2 |
About David Chaikin
David Chaikin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (13 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (9 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (2 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper), Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (1 paper) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (209 citations), Information Systems (74 citations), Accounting (31 citations), Finance (18 citations) and Strategy and Management (26 citations). David Chaikin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. C. Sharman. Their work appears in journals such as Crime Law and Social Change, Governance, Criminal Law Forum, Journal of Financial Crime and Melbourne University law review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.