Countries where authors publish in Melbourne University law review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Melbourne University law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Melbourne University law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melbourne University law review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Melbourne University law review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Melbourne University law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Melbourne University law review.
About Melbourne University law review
The 363 papers published in Melbourne University law review in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Melbourne University law review usually cover Law (218 papers), Political Science and International Relations (99 papers), Public Administration (12 papers), Accounting (29 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (97 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (91 papers), Law in Society and Culture (46 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (42 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (35 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (24 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (23 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (21 papers) and Ombudsman and Human Rights (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Melbourne University law review are George Williams, Alison Young, Michael King, Adrienne Stone, Christine Parker, Gary Edmond, Jenni Millbank, Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen, David Lindsay and Philip Lynch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.