David C. Moebius
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Toxicology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 6
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 5
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
-
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
- Co-authors
- Jason S. Kingsbury (6 shared papers)Brian A. Sparling (2 shared papers)Matthew D. Shair (2 shared papers)Andrew J. Wommack (3 shared papers)Richard R. Schrock (2 shared papers)Elizabeth S. Sattely (2 shared papers)Amir H. Hoveyda (2 shared papers)Dustin L. McMinn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Organic Letters (4 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (3 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Topics in current chemistry (1 paper)ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David C. Moebius
11 papers receiving 652 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Organic Chemistry 470
- Toxicology 24
- Pharmacology 70
- Inorganic Chemistry 59
- Pharmaceutical Science 21
Countries citing papers authored by David C. Moebius
This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Moebius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Moebius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Moebius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Moebius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Moebius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Moebius. The network helps show where David C. Moebius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside David C. Moebius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 86 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 |
About David C. Moebius
David C. Moebius is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Oncology and Plant Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (6 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (2 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (470 citations), Toxicology (24 citations), Pharmacology (70 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (59 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (21 citations). David C. Moebius has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jason S. Kingsbury, Brian A. Sparling, Matthew D. Shair, Andrew J. Wommack, Richard R. Schrock, Elizabeth S. Sattely, Amir H. Hoveyda, Dustin L. McMinn, Eric Lowe and Henry W. B. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Topics in current chemistry and ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.