David Budden

6.5k citations
37 papers · 594 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Budden

35 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

David Budden
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Business and International Management 26
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 161
  • Artificial Intelligence 174
  • Signal Processing 43
  • Molecular Biology 151
Replace Zhongmin Liu with:
Zhongmin Liu China
Ivano Lauriola Italy
Shixiong Zhang China
David Li United States
Marco Botta Italy
Nikhil Thorat United States
Yinfeng Li China
Shintami Chusnul Hidayati Indonesia
Mickaël Coustaty France
Boyuan Chen Canada
David Budden relative to Zhongmin Liu China Zhongmin Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Zhongmin Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Budden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Budden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Budden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Budden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Budden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Budden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Budden. The network helps show where David Budden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Budden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Budden Line = papers co-authored together David Budden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018123
2 201684
3
Distributed Prioritized Experience Replay
201856
4
Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradients
201834
5 201833
6 201928
7 201427
8 201426
9 201418
10
Sample-efficient adaptive text-to-speech
201816
11 201316
12 201216
13 201613
14 201411
15 201310
16 201510
17 20147
18 20156
19 20156
20 20156

About David Budden

David Budden is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Mechanical Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (7 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (4 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (2 papers), Music and Audio Processing (2 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (26 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (161 citations), Artificial Intelligence (174 citations), Signal Processing (43 citations) and Molecular Biology (151 citations). David Budden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nir Shavit, Shibani Santurkar, Edmund J. Crampin, Daniel Hurley, Alexandre Mendes, Dan Horgan, Gabriel Barth-Maron, David Silver, Alice Pébay and Timothy Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Briefings in Bioinformatics, Epigenetics & Chromatin, Bioinformatics, Cell stem cell and ACM SIGPLAN Notices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact