David B. Redwine

2.6k citations
40 papers · 1.8k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

David B. Redwine

38 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

David B. Redwine
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.6k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 777
  • Immunology 174
  • Surgery 258
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 82
Replace D. Alan Johns with:
D. Alan Johns United States
Olivier Donnez Belgium
Kazuhiro Sumimoto Japan
Anastasia Ussia Belgium
Ronald E. Batt United States
Jun Kumakiri Japan
Jan Bosteels Belgium
Giada Frontino Italy
Laurentiu Craciunas United Kingdom
Zaraq Khan United States
David B. Redwine relative to D. Alan Johns United States D. Alan Johns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
D. Alan Johns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David B. Redwine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David B. Redwine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David B. Redwine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David B. Redwine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David B. Redwine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David B. Redwine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David B. Redwine. The network helps show where David B. Redwine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside David B. Redwine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David B. Redwine Line = papers co-authored together David B. Redwine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999300
2 2001224
3 1991182
4 2008166
5 1991143
6 1987136
7 2002105
8 199693
9 198787
10 200255
11 198054
12 200643
13 199237
14 199032
15 200331
16 198818
17 201015
18 199515
19 199613
20 198912

About David B. Redwine

David B. Redwine is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Immunology and Rheumatology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (28 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (12 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (6 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (3 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers) and Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.6k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (777 citations), Immunology (174 citations), Surgery (258 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (82 citations). David B. Redwine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Wright, Leon Speroff, Alan Johns, Serdar E. Bulun, Mehmet Bertan Yılmaz, Nobuo Yaegashi, Bilgin Gürateş, Erkut Attar, Michael Putman and Gonca İmir. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery and Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact