David Aderman

977 citations
17 papers · 660 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David Aderman

17 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

David Aderman
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Applied Psychology 101
  • Social Psychology 295
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
  • Clinical Psychology 163
Replace John Altrocchi with:
John Altrocchi United States
David P. Cornell United States
Gary G. Brannigan United States
James P. David United States
A. Steven Frankel United States
Stuart Vyse United States
James M. Schuerger United States
James C. Diggory United States
A. Will Crescioni United States
Margaret A. Marshall United States
David Aderman relative to John Altrocchi United States John Altrocchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
John Altrocchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Aderman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Aderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Aderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Aderman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Aderman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Aderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Aderman. The network helps show where David Aderman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Aderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Aderman Line = papers co-authored together David Aderman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1972141
2 197488
3 197087
4 197167
5 197455
6 197947
7 197940
8 197623
9 197923
10 196920
11 198319
12 197315
13 197510
14 19779
15 19767
16 19777
17 19782

About David Aderman

David Aderman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Social Influence (6 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (101 citations), Social Psychology (295 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (134 citations) and Clinical Psychology (163 citations). David Aderman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Schulz, Leonard Berkowitz, Sharon S. Brehm, Edward E. Smith, Lawrence B. Katz, Brett N. Steenbarger, Richard Archer, H. Clayton Foushee, Mark H. Davis and Fred B. Bryant. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, Journal of Personality, Journal of Research in Personality and Cognitive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact