David Ackermann

24 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

David Ackermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Speech and Hearing 58
  • Signal Processing 91
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Music 7
Replace René van Egmond with:
René van Egmond Netherlands
Sandra Pauletto United Kingdom
Ute Jekosch Germany
Tim Perkis United States
Michael Schoeffler Germany
Vedad Hulusić United Kingdom
Kristoffer Jensen Denmark
Stefano Delle Monache Italy
JoAnn Kuchera-Morin United States
Stuart Cunningham United Kingdom
David Ackermann relative to René van Egmond Netherlands René van Egmond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
René van Egmond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ackermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ackermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ackermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ackermann. The network helps show where David Ackermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside David Ackermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ackermann Line = papers co-authored together David Ackermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201980
2
Mental Models and Human Computer Interaction I
199052
3 199127
4 202121
5 201816
6 202011
7 20198
8 20208
9 20216
10 19885
11 20184
12 20214
13 20183
14 20203
15 20172
16 20182
17 20242
18
Experimental reconstruction and simulation of mental models
19872
19 20181
20
Die Fünf-Finger-Maus: Eine Fallstudie zur Synthese von Hardware, Software und Psychologie
19851

About David Ackermann

David Ackermann is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Biomedical Engineering and Speech and Hearing, having authored 25 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers), Music and Audio Processing (2 papers) and Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (58 citations), Signal Processing (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations) and Music (7 citations). David Ackermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Weinzierl, Fabian Brinkmann, Michael J. Tauber, Lukas Aspöck, Michael Vorländer, Steffen Lepa, Christoph Böhm, Eberhard Ulich, Martin Schneider and Franz Zotter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Applied Acoustics, Acta acustica united with Acustica and EURASIP Journal on Audio Speech and Music Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact