Daphne de Groot

16 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

Daphne de Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Communication 326
  • Human-Computer Interaction 85
  • Social Psychology 285
  • Sociology and Political Science 410
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 97
Replace Joe Hoover with:
Joe Hoover United States
Li Lu United States
Robert E. Kaplan United States
Julia Braverman United States
Nicholas John Israel
Jeffrey M. Jackson United States
David N. Myers United States
Regina Lewis United States
Stephanie Jean Tsang Hong Kong
Daphne de Groot relative to Joe Hoover United States Joe Hoover's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Joe Hoover · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daphne de Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne de Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne de Groot. The network helps show where Daphne de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daphne de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daphne de Groot Line = papers co-authored together Daphne de Groot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2001386
2 2001302
3 201381
4 200932
5 201022
6 200922
7 201520
8 201011
9 201010
10
Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behaviour
20016
11
Social influence in computer-mediated communication
20015
12 20124
13 20124
14 20113
15 20182
16 20031

About Daphne de Groot

Daphne de Groot is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (326 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (85 citations), Social Psychology (285 citations), Sociology and Political Science (410 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (97 citations). Daphne de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Russell Spears, Martin Lea, Tom Postmes, Gerard Pasterkamp, Imo E. Hoefer, Sebastian Grundmann, Dominique P.V. de Kleijn, Marcel L. Geleijnse, T. I. G. van der Spoel and Renate de Jong. Their work appears in journals such as Current Vascular Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Endovascular Therapy and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact