Danling Peng

3.7k citations
80 papers · 2.9k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Danling Peng

74 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Danling Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 739
  • Statistics and Probability 188
  • Clinical Psychology 362
Replace Li Hai Tan with:
Li Hai Tan Hong Kong
Marc F. Joanisse Canada
Genevieve McArthur Australia
Guosheng Ding China
Remo Job Italy
Gedeon O. Deák United States
Jefferson Provost United States
James L. McClelland United States
Karolina Janacsek Hungary
J. Bruce Morton Canada
Danling Peng relative to Li Hai Tan Hong Kong Li Hai Tan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Li Hai Tan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danling Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danling Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danling Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danling Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danling Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danling Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danling Peng. The network helps show where Danling Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danling Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danling Peng Line = papers co-authored together Danling Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012385
2 1999190
3 2007131
4 2009130
5 2011129
6 2004128
7 1995111
8 199283
9 200383
10 200975
11 200868
12 200967
13 200364
14 201262
15 200559
16 200656
17 201148
18 201147
19 201247
20 200845

About Danling Peng

Danling Peng is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (39 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (32 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (739 citations), Statistics and Probability (188 citations) and Clinical Psychology (362 citations). Danling Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Guosheng Ding, Chunming Lu, Marcus Taft, Taomei Guo, Jing Jiang, Chaozhe Zhu, Liu Li, Bohan Dai, Xiaoping Zhu and Zhen Jin. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Language, NeuroImage, Human Brain Mapping, Neuroreport and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact