Danielle Williams
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management
- Leadership and Management top 5%
- Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Helen Courtney‐Pratt (1 shared paper)Annette Marlow (1 shared paper)Karen Ford (1 shared paper)Ron Mason (1 shared paper)Stephen Wilkinson (4 shared papers)Melanie J. Sharman (4 shared papers)Douglas Ezzy (4 shared papers)Alison Venn (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Health Sociology Review (3 papers)The Cancer Journal (1 paper)Collection Management (1 paper)Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care (1 paper)Health Expectations (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Danielle Williams
18 papers receiving 573 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Research and Theory 68
- Leadership and Management 33
- Pharmacy 17
- General Health Professions 95
- Cancer Research 40
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Williams. The network helps show where Danielle Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 171 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 44 | |
| 6 | Barriers to diagnosing and managing hypertension - a qualitative study in Australian general practice. | 2010 | 40 |
| 7 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 16 | PORRIGE - a cohort study of general practice registrars. | 2011 | 3 |
| 17 | Hurting to Cope: Self-Injurious Behavior as an Escape from Self-Focus | 2010 | 1 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1 |
About Danielle Williams
Danielle Williams is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Surgery, Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (68 citations), Leadership and Management (33 citations), Pharmacy (17 citations), General Health Professions (95 citations) and Cancer Research (40 citations). Danielle Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Courtney‐Pratt, Annette Marlow, Karen Ford, Ron Mason, Stephen Wilkinson, Melanie J. Sharman, Douglas Ezzy, Alison Venn, Stephen P. Ethier and Vanessa F. Merino. Their work appears in journals such as Health Sociology Review, The Cancer Journal, Collection Management, Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care and Health Expectations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.