Danielle Williams

773 citations
18 papers · 535 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Obesity and Health Practices 5
    • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 3
    • Body Contouring and Surgery 3

Danielle Williams

18 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

Danielle Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Pharmacy 60
  • Leadership and Management 9
  • Linguistics and Language 22
  • General Health Professions 118
Replace Jihea Choi with:
Jihea Choi South Korea
Katherine C. Brewer United States
Lakshman Swamy United States
Lea Godino Italy
Elizabeth Barker United States
Rachel Hirschey United States
Maggie Carson United Kingdom
Emma Rowland United Kingdom
Elizabeth L. J. van Rensen Netherlands
Jennifer Bell Canada
Danielle Williams relative to Jihea Choi South Korea Jihea Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jihea Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Williams. The network helps show where Danielle Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Williams Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011159
2 201587
3 201753
4 199741
5 201539
6
Barriers to diagnosing and managing hypertension - a qualitative study in Australian general practice.
201039
7 201038
8 202116
9 201614
10 201614
11 202211
12 20177
13 20174
14 20204
15 20184
16
PORRIGE - a cohort study of general practice registrars.
20113
17
Hurting to Cope: Self-Injurious Behavior as an Escape from Self-Focus
20101
18 20211

About Danielle Williams

Danielle Williams is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Surgery, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (57 citations), Pharmacy (60 citations), Leadership and Management (9 citations), Linguistics and Language (22 citations) and General Health Professions (118 citations). Danielle Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. F. Cooper, Ron Mason, Karen Ford, Helen Courtney‐Pratt, Annette Marlow, Emily Hansen, Alison Venn, Mark Nelson, Vanessa F. Merino and Jeffrey R. Marks. Their work appears in journals such as Health Sociology Review, Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, Collection Management, The Prostate and BMC Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact