Danielle Stokeld
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Graeme R. Gillespie (11 shared papers)John C. Z. Woinarski (6 shared papers)Brydie M. Hill (7 shared papers)Brett P. Murphy (4 shared papers)Andrew J. Hamer (3 shared papers)Alaric Fisher (4 shared papers)Tim S. Doherty (1 shared paper)Russell Palmer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Wildlife Research (6 papers)Biological Conservation (4 papers)Mammal Review (2 papers)Austral Ecology (1 paper)Australian Journal of Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaPhilippinesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Danielle Stokeld
23 papers receiving 864 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Ecological Modeling 158
- Ecology 713
- Virology 69
- Genetics 378
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 139
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Stokeld
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Stokeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Stokeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Stokeld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Stokeld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Stokeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Stokeld. The network helps show where Danielle Stokeld may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Stokeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 214 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 17 | A guide for the use of remote cameras for wildlife survey in northern Australia | 2015 | 13 |
| 18 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 7 |
About Danielle Stokeld
Danielle Stokeld is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 24 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (18 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers) and Ecology and biodiversity studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (158 citations), Ecology (713 citations), Virology (69 citations), Genetics (378 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (139 citations). Danielle Stokeld has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Philippines and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Graeme R. Gillespie, John C. Z. Woinarski, Brydie M. Hill, Brett P. Murphy, Andrew J. Hamer, Alaric Fisher, Tim S. Doherty, Russell Palmer, Sarah Legge and Glenn P. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Wildlife Research, Biological Conservation, Mammal Review, Austral Ecology and Australian Journal of Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.