Danielle Marks
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Papers in
-
- Innovative Teaching Methods 2
- Child Development and Digital Technology 2
- Online and Blended Learning 1
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey Braithwaite (2 shared papers)Brette Blakely (2 shared papers)Peter Hibbert (1 shared paper)Janet C. Long (1 shared paper)Natalie Hannaford (1 shared paper)Jennifer Plumb (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Karcher (3 shared papers)Robyn Clay‐Williams (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Foodborne Pathogens and Disease (2 papers)Poultry Science (1 paper)Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal (1 paper)Partner Abuse (1 paper)PEDIATRICS (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Danielle Marks
12 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- General Health Professions 99
- Research and Theory 3
- Health Information Management 16
- Cognitive Neuroscience 48
- Emergency Medical Services 15
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Marks
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Marks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Marks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Marks. The network helps show where Danielle Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 111 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 |
About Danielle Marks
Danielle Marks is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Ecology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper) and Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (99 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations), Health Information Management (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (48 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (15 citations). Danielle Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Braithwaite, Brette Blakely, Peter Hibbert, Janet C. Long, Natalie Hannaford, Jennifer Plumb, Elizabeth Karcher, Robyn Clay‐Williams, Elia Vecellio and Mary T. Westbrook. Their work appears in journals such as Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, Poultry Science, Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, Partner Abuse and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.