Danielle Macbeth
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 1%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 19
- Philosophy 17
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 4
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 4
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 2
Danielle Macbeth
28 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Theoretical Computer Science 106
- History and Philosophy of Science 69
- Philosophy 80
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
- Artificial Intelligence 47
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Macbeth
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Macbeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Macbeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Macbeth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Macbeth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Macbeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Macbeth. The network helps show where Danielle Macbeth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Macbeth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 3 | Frege's logic | 2005 | 24 |
| 4 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 8 | Diagrammatic Reasoning in Euclid's Elements | 2010 | 12 |
| 9 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 14 | Meaning, Use, and Diagrams | 2009 | 5 |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 2 |
About Danielle Macbeth
Danielle Macbeth is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (19 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (4 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (106 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (69 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (47 citations). Danielle Macbeth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wilfrid Sellars and Willem A. deVries. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophia Mathematica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.