Danielle M. Blake

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Danielle M. Blake
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Otorhinolaryngology 79
  • Oncology 420
  • Pharmacy 73
  • Gender Studies 60
  • Emergency Medicine 52
Replace Lauren E. Miller with:
Lauren E. Miller United States
Tanya Kim Meyer United States
Carol Anne Murdoch‐Kinch United States
Guillermo Sánchez Colombia
Harry V. M. Spiers United Kingdom
Walter W. Tunnessen United States
R Cocchi Italy
Mariam Naqvi United States
Freny Rashmiraj Karjodkar India
Rebecca L. Slayton United States
Danielle M. Blake relative to Lauren E. Miller United States Lauren E. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Lauren E. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle M. Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle M. Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle M. Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle M. Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle M. Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle M. Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle M. Blake. The network helps show where Danielle M. Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle M. Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle M. Blake Line = papers co-authored together Danielle M. Blake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021214
2 2020167
3 202099
4 201265
5 198762
6 202054
7 201449
8 201445
9 201543
10 202243
11 201340
12 201337
13 201334
14 201633
15 200331
16 201330
17 201327
18 202126
19 199123
20 201419

About Danielle M. Blake

Danielle M. Blake is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Pharmacy, Oncology, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (2 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (79 citations), Oncology (420 citations), Pharmacy (73 citations), Gender Studies (60 citations) and Emergency Medicine (52 citations). Danielle M. Blake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean Anderson Eloy, Peter F. Svider, Soly Baredes, Alejandro L. Vázquez, Robert W. Jyung, HOWARD L. MINKOFF, Amos Grünebaum, Adam J. Folbe, Mohemmed Nazir Khan and Andrew C. Mauro. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otolaryngology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact