Danielle Fehr

423 citations
9 papers · 239 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Fehr

8 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Danielle Fehr
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Virology 64
  • Animal Science and Zoology 73
  • Infectious Diseases 74
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 38
  • Otorhinolaryngology 13
Replace L. R. Thomsett with:
L. R. Thomsett United Kingdom
Sandra Newbury United States
Navapon Techakriengkrai Thailand
Paul J.A. Sondermeijer United States
Takele Argaw United States
Birgitta Lindqvist Sweden
Dina B Tresnan United States
Maria Alice Gomes-Keller Switzerland
Filip Barbé Belgium
Andelé M. Conradie Germany
Danielle Fehr relative to L. R. Thomsett United Kingdom L. R. Thomsett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
L. R. Thomsett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Fehr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Fehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Fehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Fehr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Fehr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Fehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Fehr. The network helps show where Danielle Fehr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Fehr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Fehr Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Fehr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1996115
2 199965
3 201920
4
[Detection of feline coronavirus using RT-PCR: basis for the study of the pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP)].
199620
5 202214
6
[Liberation into the wild of wild felines--danger of the release of virus infections].
19963
7 20241
8 20251
9 20250

About Danielle Fehr

Danielle Fehr is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Infectious Diseases, Dermatology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (1 paper), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (1 paper) and Zoonotic diseases and public health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (64 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (73 citations), Infectious Diseases (74 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (38 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (13 citations). Danielle Fehr has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Madagascar and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Lutz, Regina Hofmann‐Lehmann, Craig Packer, Janice S. Martenson, Stephen J. O’Brien, Peter Schmid‐Grendelmeier, Christian M. Leutenegger, Monika Hartmann, Christian Riols and Sara Micaletto. Their work appears in journals such as Allergy, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Clinical and Translational Allergy, Allergo Journal International and Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact