Danielle E. Durie

965 citations
22 papers · 710 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle E. Durie

20 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers

Danielle E. Durie
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 226
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 102
  • Molecular Biology 294
  • Clinical Biochemistry 28
  • Immunology 82
Replace Valérie Serazin with:
Valérie Serazin France
Sampada Kallol Switzerland
Hongchu Bao China
Sandy Lau New Zealand
Sayaka Tsuda Japan
Emiel D. Post Uiterweer Netherlands
Xietong Wang China
Demetrios P. Kassanos Greece
Yuditiya Purwosunu Indonesia
Schindler Am Switzerland
Danielle E. Durie relative to Valérie Serazin France Valérie Serazin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Valérie Serazin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle E. Durie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle E. Durie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle E. Durie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle E. Durie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle E. Durie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle E. Durie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle E. Durie. The network helps show where Danielle E. Durie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle E. Durie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle E. Durie Line = papers co-authored together Danielle E. Durie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014149
2 202293
3 201184
4 201080
5 201476
6 201234
7 201729
8 201026
9 201026
10 201224
11 201517
12 201315
13 201514
14 202413
15 201110
16 20177
17 19865
18 20173
19 20213
20 20162

About Danielle E. Durie

Danielle E. Durie is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Immunology and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (226 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (102 citations), Molecular Biology (294 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (28 citations) and Immunology (82 citations). Danielle E. Durie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Christopher Glantz, Loralei Lacina Thornburg, Martin Holčı́k, Stephen M. Lewis, Myriam Gorospe, Urszula Liwak, Magdalena Kisilewicz, ANTHONY C. SCISCIONE, Hui Li and Bingqian Liu. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Analytical Chemistry and Seminars in Perinatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact