Danielle D’Amico

18 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Danielle D’Amico
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Human-Computer Interaction 23
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Health 13
Replace Markus Nyström with:
Markus Nyström Sweden
Jolene Jacquart United States
Willemijn Scholten Netherlands
Euclides José de Mendonça Filho Brazil
Adam Haim United States
Marianna de Abreu Costa Brazil
Renske C. Bosman Netherlands
Adam Bibbey United Kingdom
Lisa J. Germeroth United States
Neil Nixon United Kingdom
Danielle D’Amico relative to Markus Nyström Sweden Markus Nyström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Markus Nyström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle D’Amico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle D’Amico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle D’Amico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle D’Amico more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle D’Amico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle D’Amico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle D’Amico. The network helps show where Danielle D’Amico may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle D’Amico, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle D’Amico Line = papers co-authored together Danielle D’Amico links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202064
2 202146
3 202032
4 202227
5 202116
6 201915
7 202015
8 202012
9 20239
10 20239
11 20197
12 20227
13 20224
14 20192
15 20241
16 20211
17 20221
18 19971
19 20240
20 20250

About Danielle D’Amico

Danielle D’Amico is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Behavioral Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (23 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Health (13 citations). Danielle D’Amico has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Fiocco, Seung Hwan Lee, Guylaine Ferland, Danielle Laurin, Matthew D. Parrott, Carol E. Greenwood, Pierrette Gaudreau, Vivian Huang, Sylvie Belleville and Nicole D. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Innovation in Aging, Gerontology and Nutrition Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact