Danielle Booth

1.3k citations
14 papers · 963 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Booth

14 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

Danielle Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Information Systems 584
  • Computer Science Applications 85
  • Information Systems and Management 97
  • Artificial Intelligence 345
  • Signal Processing 90
Replace Jiepu Jiang with:
Jiepu Jiang United States
Don Turnbull United States
Judy Bateman United States
Maria Soledad Pera United States
Daniel E. Rose United States
Toine Bogers Denmark
Ayşe Göker United Kingdom
Shuguang Han United States
Sandy Payette United States
Sarantos Kapidakis Greece
Danielle Booth relative to Jiepu Jiang United States Jiepu Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jiepu Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Booth. The network helps show where Danielle Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Booth Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007356
2 2007152
3
Determining the informational, navigational and transactional intent of web queries
2008147
4 2009128
5 200968
6 201038
7 200929
8 201618
9 201112
10 20095
11 20093
12 20073
13 20072
14 20112

About Danielle Booth

Danielle Booth is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (10 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (6 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (584 citations), Computer Science Applications (85 citations), Information Systems and Management (97 citations), Artificial Intelligence (345 citations) and Signal Processing (90 citations). Danielle Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink, Brian Smith, Z. Ihara, Mimi Zhang and Ying Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Information Processing & Management, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, European Urology Focus, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology and Office of Education Research; Faculty of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact