Brian Smith

2.0k citations
90 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Smith

80 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Brian Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Computer Science Applications 155
  • Human-Computer Interaction 144
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 264
  • Religious studies 74
  • Applied Psychology 36
Replace Kasım Karataş with:
Kasım Karataş Türkiye
Kathleen O’Connor United States
İbrahim Yıldırım Türkiye
Kathleen M. Galotti United States
Marcy P. Driscoll United States
Marianne Bakia United States
Yukie Toyama United States
Turgut Karaköse Türkiye
Susan A. Ambrose United States
Meltem Huri Baturay Türkiye
Brian Smith relative to Kasım Karataş Türkiye Kasım Karataş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.3×
Kasım Karataş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Smith. The network helps show where Brian Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Smith Line = papers co-authored together Brian Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009116
2 2006114
3 200684
4 199062
5 200557
6
Classifying the Universe: The Ancient Indian Varna System and the Origins of Caste
199440
7 200336
8 201329
9 199826
10 200625
11 199025
12
Healthy Video Gaming: Oxymoron or Possibility?
200824
13 202424
14 200821
15 200021
16 200620
17 201919
18 200817
19 200515
20 199514

About Brian Smith

Brian Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Religious studies, Philosophy and Computer Science Applications, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (12 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (11 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (4 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (155 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (144 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (264 citations), Religious studies (74 citations) and Applied Psychology (36 citations). Brian Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Magy Seif El‐Nasr, Brian J. Reiser, Jeana Frost, Bernard J. Jansen, Danielle Booth, Frederick M. Smith, Marcela Borge, Tugce Aldemir, George Graham and Stephen Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Numen, History of Religions, IBM Systems Journal and Computer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact