Danielle Arigo

2.8k citations
92 papers · 1.8k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Arigo

89 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Danielle Arigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Applied Psychology 332
  • Clinical Psychology 524
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 209
  • Health 108
  • Pharmacy 57
Replace Kristoffer S. Berlin with:
Kristoffer S. Berlin United States
Matthew Bambling Australia
Fernando L. Vázquez Spain
Kwok‐Kei Mak Hong Kong
Barbara Dooley Ireland
Colleen Stiles‐Shields United States
Chadia Haddad Lebanon
Anne H. Berman Sweden
Janine Devine Germany
Giada Pietrabissa Italy
Danielle Arigo relative to Kristoffer S. Berlin United States Kristoffer S. Berlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kristoffer S. Berlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Arigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Arigo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Arigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Arigo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Arigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Arigo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Arigo. The network helps show where Danielle Arigo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Arigo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Arigo Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Arigo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018168
2 2019121
3 2014120
4 200491
5 201282
6 202181
7 200973
8 201155
9 201455
10 201552
11 201351
12 202040
13 201439
14 201138
15 201537
16 201435
17 201835
18 202035
19 201232
20 201130

About Danielle Arigo

Danielle Arigo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Physiology, General Health Professions and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (22 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (21 papers), Physical Activity and Health (18 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (332 citations), Clinical Psychology (524 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (209 citations), Health (108 citations) and Pharmacy (57 citations). Danielle Arigo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Joshua M. Smyth, Meghan L. Butryn, Sherry Pagoto, Leah M. Schumacher, Jerry Suls, Greer A. Raggio, Megan M. Brown, Camille Nebeker, Sarah E. Lillie and Lisa Carter‐Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Journal of Health Psychology, Digital Health and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact