Danielle Arigo

2.9k citations
102 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Arigo

95 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Danielle Arigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Applied Psychology 405
  • Clinical Psychology 564
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 244
  • Health 110
  • Pharmacy 63
Replace Matthew Bambling with:
Matthew Bambling Australia
Colleen Stiles‐Shields United States
Barbara A. Dooley Ireland
Kristoffer S. Berlin United States
Andrea K. Graham United States
Tore Bonsaksen Norway
Sophie Berjot France
Kwok‐Kei Mak Hong Kong
Helen Riess United States
Jimi Huh United States
Danielle Arigo relative to Matthew Bambling Australia Matthew Bambling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Matthew Bambling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Arigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Arigo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Arigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Arigo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Arigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Arigo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Arigo. The network helps show where Danielle Arigo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Arigo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Arigo Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Arigo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018177
2 2019132
3 2014122
4 200499
5 202187
6 201284
7 201178
8 200976
9 201458
10 201156
11 201553
12 201352
13 202046
14 202040
15 201840
16 201140
17 201538
18 201438
19 201435
20 201233

About Danielle Arigo

Danielle Arigo is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (22 papers), Physical Activity and Health (20 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (12 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (405 citations), Clinical Psychology (564 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (244 citations), Health (110 citations) and Pharmacy (63 citations). Danielle Arigo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Joshua Morrison Smyth, Meghan L. Butryn, Sherry Pagoto, Jerry M. Suls, Leah M. Schumacher, Greer A. Raggio, Megan M. Brown, Camille Nebeker, Sarah E. Lillie and Lisa Carter‐Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Behavioral Medicine and Digital Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact