Daniela Trisciuzzi

38 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Daniela Trisciuzzi
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 398
  • Pharmacology 109
  • Pharmacology 52
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 67
Replace Mohamed Diwan M. AbdulHameed with:
Mohamed Diwan M. AbdulHameed United States
Marlene T. Kim United States
Tomasz Magdziarz Poland
Guixia Liu China
Heather L. Ciallella United States
Shaohua Shi China
Nicolas Bosc United Kingdom
Vishal B. Siramshetty United States
Jens Kunze Switzerland
Daniela Trisciuzzi relative to Mohamed Diwan M. AbdulHameed United States Mohamed Diwan M. AbdulHameed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Mohamed Diwan M. AbdulHameed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Trisciuzzi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Trisciuzzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Trisciuzzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Trisciuzzi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Trisciuzzi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Trisciuzzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Trisciuzzi. The network helps show where Daniela Trisciuzzi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Trisciuzzi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Trisciuzzi Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Trisciuzzi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202073
2 201865
3 202243
4 201740
5 201535
6 202235
7 201933
8 201731
9 201831
10 201729
11 201826
12 201825
13 201623
14 202022
15 201720
16 202420
17 202220
18 202418
19 202315
20 202215

About Daniela Trisciuzzi

Daniela Trisciuzzi is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (26 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (10 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (6 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (6 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (398 citations), Pharmacology (109 citations), Pharmacology (52 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (67 citations). Daniela Trisciuzzi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Orazio Nicolotti, Giuseppe Felice Mangiatordi, Nicola Gambacorta, Domenico Alberga, Fulvio Ciriaco, Francesco Leonetti, Domenico Alberga, Nicola Amoroso, Marco Catto and Kamel Mansouri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Molecules, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Journal of Computational Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact