Daniela Rubino

26 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Daniela Rubino
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 32
  • Rehabilitation 21
  • Reproductive Medicine 24
  • Genetics 27
  • Physiology 62
Replace Maria Mancini with:
Maria Mancini United States
Esra Saygılı Germany
Valerie M. Harris United States
Hallie N. Nelson United States
Jinyue Liao Hong Kong
Miguel Caetano Monteiro France
Chanond A. Nasamran United States
Jianwei Xu China
Satoru YASUTAKA Japan
Stefanie Lemmens Belgium
Daniela Rubino relative to Maria Mancini United States Maria Mancini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Maria Mancini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Rubino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Rubino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Rubino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Rubino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Rubino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Rubino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Rubino. The network helps show where Daniela Rubino may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Rubino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Rubino Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Rubino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201665
2 201938
3 201634
4 201631
5 201824
6 201722
7 201820
8 202214
9 202311
10 202110
11 20198
12 20157
13 20185
14 20175
15 20173
16 20173
17 20143
18 20192
19 20092
20 20092

About Daniela Rubino

Daniela Rubino is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (8 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers) and Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (32 citations), Rehabilitation (21 citations), Reproductive Medicine (24 citations), Genetics (27 citations) and Physiology (62 citations). Daniela Rubino has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Hafner, Dirk Fischer, Leo H. Bonati, Nuri Gueven, Oliver Bieri, M Gloor, Thomas Zumbrunn, Arne Fischmann, Claudio Zamagni and Stefanie Deuster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Neuromuscular Disorders and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact