Daniela Lemmo

28 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

Daniela Lemmo
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 166
  • Clinical Psychology 224
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 101
Replace Giorgia Margherita with:
Giorgia Margherita Italy
Valerio Dell’Oste Italy
Sabrina Bonichini Italy
Włodzimierz Oniszczenko Poland
Ian K. Villalta United States
Ann‐Marie Creaven Ireland
Martha Strachan United States
Mathilde Horn France
Jens Siegert Germany
Mehmet Z. Sungur Türkiye
Daniela Lemmo relative to Giorgia Margherita Italy Giorgia Margherita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Giorgia Margherita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Lemmo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Lemmo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Lemmo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Lemmo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Lemmo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Lemmo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Lemmo. The network helps show where Daniela Lemmo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Lemmo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Lemmo Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Lemmo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020158
2 202073
3 202159
4 202237
5 201929
6 202127
7
The Relationship Between Resilience and Sleep Quality During the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study
202226
8 202122
9 201919
10 201917
11 202213
12 202111
13 202211
14 202210
15 202210
16 201910
17 20229
18 20239
19 20217
20 20207

About Daniela Lemmo

Daniela Lemmo is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (166 citations), Clinical Psychology (224 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (37 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations). Daniela Lemmo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maria Francesca Freda, Maria Luisa Martino, Emanuela Saita, Christian Franceschini, Vittorio Lenzo, Alessandro Musetti, Roberto Cattivelli, Elena Vegni, Lidia Borghi and Maria C. Quattropani. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Qualitative Health Research, Journal of Sleep Research and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact