Daniela Klaus

1.0k citations
33 papers · 487 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Klaus

29 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Daniela Klaus
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 44
  • Health 109
  • Demography 147
  • Gender Studies 73
  • Sociology and Political Science 192
Replace Lori Kaplan with:
Lori Kaplan United States
Heejeong Choi South Korea
Barbara D. Ames United States
Paula Y. Goodwin United States
Anne Scott United Kingdom
Hui Xie United States
Brendan Stevenson New Zealand
Emily Wentzell United States
Roosevelt Wright United States
Melisa Price United States
Daniela Klaus relative to Lori Kaplan United States Lori Kaplan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Lori Kaplan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Klaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Klaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Klaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Klaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Klaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Klaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Klaus. The network helps show where Daniela Klaus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Klaus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Klaus Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Klaus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016193
2 200762
3 200934
4 201626
5 201923
6 201221
7 200719
8 201218
9 202113
10 20158
11 20077
12 20146
13
Pflege und Unterstützung durch Angehörige
20166
14 20146
15
A case study in planning for public health education: the organ and tissue donation experience.
19946
16 20105
17 20234
18 20224
19 20194
20 20214

About Daniela Klaus

Daniela Klaus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Health and Medical Studies (5 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (44 citations), Health (109 citations), Demography (147 citations), Gender Studies (73 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (192 citations). Daniela Klaus has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Nauck, Katharina Mahne, Heribert Engstler, Clemens Tesch‐Römer, Julia K. Wolff, Julia Simonson, Susanne Wurm, Sebastian Schnettler, Anja Steinbach and Arun Tipandjan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Current Sociology, Animal Reproduction Science, Journal of Family Issues and Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact