Daniela Hellwig

456 citations
15 papers · 342 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Hellwig

15 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Daniela Hellwig
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cell Biology 127
  • Infectious Diseases 96
  • Molecular Biology 232
  • Plant Science 120
  • Epidemiology 81
Replace Steven A. Heidler with:
Steven A. Heidler United States
Hanna Windecker Germany
Katherine M. Nyswaner United States
Varandt Y. Khodaverdian United States
Lakhansing Pardeshi Macao
Nagavardhini Avuthu United States
Kelly J. Bouchonville United States
Claire Manson United Kingdom
Rekha Puria India
Jaideep Mallick Canada
Daniela Hellwig relative to Steven A. Heidler United States Steven A. Heidler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Steven A. Heidler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Hellwig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Hellwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Hellwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Hellwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Hellwig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Hellwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Hellwig. The network helps show where Daniela Hellwig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Hellwig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Hellwig Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Hellwig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201159
2 201554
3 201151
4 202030
5 201227
6 200826
7 200725
8 201620
9 201717
10 200912
11 200610
12
[Comparison of relative 18FDG uptake with metabolic rate (MRGlucose) in the myocardium in CAD, classified by 99m-Tc-MIBI].
19955
13 19953
14 19952
15
[End-diastolic volumes of the left ventricle in computer tomography in comparison to heart catheter ventriculography].
19811

About Daniela Hellwig

Daniela Hellwig is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Infectious Diseases and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (4 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (127 citations), Infectious Diseases (96 citations), Molecular Biology (232 citations), Plant Science (120 citations) and Epidemiology (81 citations). Daniela Hellwig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christian Hoischen, Stephan Diekmann, Ronny Martin, Oliver Kurzai, Lisa Prendergast, Michael Weber, Kevin F. Sullivan, Patrick Meraldi, Andrew D. McAinsh and Volker Döring. Their work appears in journals such as mBio, Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine, Yeast, PLoS Biology and Journal of Cell Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact