Daniela Deponti

17 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Daniela Deponti
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Rheumatology 122
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 67
  • Urology 48
  • Biomaterials 68
  • Surgery 197
Replace Kumi Orita with:
Kumi Orita Japan
Robby D. Bowles United States
Wangping Duan China
Flavio Ronzoni Italy
Hanane Chajra France
Matthew Freeman United States
Seiko Tatehara Japan
Ashley A. Amini United States
Stephen P. Frean United Kingdom
Smith Rl United States
Daniela Deponti relative to Kumi Orita Japan Kumi Orita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kumi Orita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Deponti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Deponti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Deponti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Deponti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Deponti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Deponti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Deponti. The network helps show where Daniela Deponti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Deponti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Deponti Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Deponti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201360
2 200954
3 200745
4 201345
5 201239
6 201430
7 201329
8 201427
9 201525
10 201720
11 201218
12 201316
13 201814
14 201013
15 20119
16
Genetic correlation between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease: the role of sex and IL-10.
20194
17 20141

About Daniela Deponti

Daniela Deponti is a scholar working on Surgery, Urology, Rheumatology, Molecular Biology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (8 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (6 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (122 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (67 citations), Urology (48 citations), Biomaterials (68 citations) and Surgery (197 citations). Daniela Deponti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Vietnam and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Alessia Di Giancamillo, Giuseppe M. Peretti, C. Domeneghini, Alessandro Sannino, Celeste Scotti, Iván Martín, Francesca Gervaso, Silvia Brunelli, Raffaella Meneveri and Giulio Cossu. Their work appears in journals such as Tissue Engineering Part A, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Animal Science and Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact