Daniela Defazio

8 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Daniela Defazio
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 103
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 72
  • Management Information Systems 75
  • Strategy and Management 91
  • Economics and Econometrics 126
Replace Jutta Wollersheim with:
Jutta Wollersheim Germany
Yender Lee Canada
Maryann Feldman United States
Terri L. Herron United States
Donato Cutolo Italy
Geoff Lightfoot United Kingdom
Jane Côté United States
Konstantinos Grigoriou United States
Alex Vestal United States
Daniela Defazio relative to Jutta Wollersheim Germany Jutta Wollersheim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Jutta Wollersheim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Defazio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Defazio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Defazio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Defazio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Defazio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Defazio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Defazio. The network helps show where Daniela Defazio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Defazio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Defazio Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Defazio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2009204
2 202085
3 201750
4 20207
5 20225
6 20103
7 20062
8 20171

About Daniela Defazio

Daniela Defazio is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Communication, having authored 8 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (2 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper) and Sharing Economy and Platforms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (103 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (72 citations), Management Information Systems (75 citations), Strategy and Management (91 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (126 citations). Daniela Defazio has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andy Lockett, Mike Wright, Cristina Rossi‐Lamastra, Chiara Franzoni, Kimberley R. Isett, Paige Clayton, Shiri M. Breznitz, Ammon Salter, Markus Perkmann and Christos Kolympiris. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Studies in Higher Education, Design Science, The Journal of Technology Transfer and Journal of Business Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact