Daniela de Feo

530 citations
8 papers · 399 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela de Feo

8 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Daniela de Feo
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 185
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 101
  • Equine 9
  • Reproductive Medicine 42
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 45
Replace Carl-Gustaf Nilsson with:
Carl-Gustaf Nilsson Finland
R Steendijk Netherlands
Çiğdem Tüzün Türkiye
Carlo Valtorta Italy
Hans Zmierczak Belgium
Chaithra Prasad United States
Salman Kirmani United States
Giancarlo Prossomariti Italy
Michèle Noël France
Heinrich Resch Austria
Daniela de Feo relative to Carl-Gustaf Nilsson Finland Carl-Gustaf Nilsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Carl-Gustaf Nilsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela de Feo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela de Feo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela de Feo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela de Feo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela de Feo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela de Feo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela de Feo. The network helps show where Daniela de Feo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela de Feo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela de Feo Line = papers co-authored together Daniela de Feo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2006258
2 200534
3 199824
4 199724
5 199821
6 199620
7 200711
8 20157

About Daniela de Feo

Daniela de Feo is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Agronomy and Crop Science, Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (185 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (101 citations), Equine (9 citations), Reproductive Medicine (42 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (45 citations). Daniela de Feo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandro Giannini, Andrea Giustina, Luigi Moro, Alberto Angeli, Giuseppe Guglielmi, R. Giorgino, Giovanni Capelli, Andrea Dovio, Fiorella Miceli and Antonio Lanzone. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Osteoporosis International, BMC Women s Health, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Bone.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact