Daniela C. Schröter

25 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Daniela C. Schröter
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Management Science and Operations Research 329
  • Public Administration 76
  • Information Systems and Management 99
  • General Health Professions 268
  • Applied Psychology 40
Replace Sue Funnell with:
Sue Funnell United States
Brad Astbury Australia
Christian Dagenais Canada
Laura R. Peck United States
Sanjeev Sridharan Canada
Dale Butterill Canada
Olympia Kyriakidou United Kingdom
Abby Haynes Australia
Martin Williams United Kingdom
Ka Ho Brian Chor United States
Daniela C. Schröter relative to Sue Funnell United States Sue Funnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sue Funnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela C. Schröter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela C. Schröter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela C. Schröter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela C. Schröter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela C. Schröter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela C. Schröter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela C. Schröter. The network helps show where Daniela C. Schröter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniela C. Schröter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela C. Schröter Line = papers co-authored together Daniela C. Schröter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010285
2 200899
3 200882
4 201456
5 201747
6 201446
7 201521
8 201920
9 201618
10 200815
11 201914
12 201113
13
SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION CHECKLIST
20109
14 20248
15 20077
16 20146
17 20203
18 20043
19 20053
20 20041

About Daniela C. Schröter

Daniela C. Schröter is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (15 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (329 citations), Public Administration (76 citations), Information Systems and Management (99 citations), General Health Professions (268 citations) and Applied Psychology (40 citations). Daniela C. Schröter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Peru and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris L. S. Coryn, Carl D. Westine, Jessica L. Urschel, Stephen Magura, Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead, J. R. Mattox, Tarek Azzam, P. Cristian Gugiu, Elizabeth Davidson and Michael Scriven. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning, Water Science & Technology, Energy Efficiency and Journal of Mixed Methods Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact