Daniela Butera

24 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniela Butera
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Food Science 1.1k
  • Biochemistry 219
  • Insect Science 192
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 239
  • Plant Science 421
Replace Débora Esposito with:
Débora Esposito United States
Maria Consuelo Andrade Marques Brazil
Arquimedes Gasparotto Brazil
Priscila de Souza Brazil
Rafeeq Alam Khan Pakistan
Albert Kamanyi Cameroon
Kely de Picoli Souza Brazil
Homa Hajimehdipoor Iran
Bamidele Victor Owoyele Nigeria
Baokang Huang China
Daniela Butera relative to Débora Esposito United States Débora Esposito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Débora Esposito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Butera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Butera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Butera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Butera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Butera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Butera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Butera. The network helps show where Daniela Butera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Butera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Butera Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Butera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002442
2 2004231
3 2004214
4 2005129
5 2007128
6 2003116
7 200777
8 200168
9 200949
10 200643
11 200835
12 200731
13 200129
14 201225
15
Correlation between low folate levels and hyperhomocysteinemia, but not with vitamin B12 in hypertensive patients.
201420
16 200219
17 201915
18 201910
19 20108
20
Pap smear in the prevention of HPV-related anal cancer: preliminary results of the study in a male population at risk.
20167

About Daniela Butera

Daniela Butera is a scholar working on Food Science, Surgery, Pharmacology, Epidemiology and Biochemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botanical Research and Applications (6 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (2 papers) and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.1k citations), Biochemistry (219 citations), Insect Science (192 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (239 citations) and Plant Science (421 citations). Daniela Butera has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Luisa Tesoriere, Mario Allegra, M. A. Livrea, Anna Maria Pintaudi, Francesca Di Gaudio, Carla Gentile, Antonino Bongiorno, R. Kohen, Marco Fazzari and Maria A. Livrea. Their work appears in journals such as Free Radical Research, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Pineal Research and Journal of Food Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact