Daniela Billups

638 citations
12 papers · 545 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Billups

12 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Daniela Billups
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 425
  • Biochemistry 93
  • Developmental Neuroscience 41
  • Neurology 74
  • Sensory Systems 32
Replace Kyoichi Emi with:
Kyoichi Emi Japan
Marie‐Françoise Isambert France
Stéphanie De Gois France
Stephen J. Moss United States
Jeffrey A. Dzubay United States
Charu Misra United Kingdom
Brona S. O'Dowd Australia
Teruyuki Fukushima Japan
Eitan S Kaplan United States
Quentin Chevy France
Daniela Billups relative to Kyoichi Emi Japan Kyoichi Emi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kyoichi Emi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Billups

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Billups's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Billups with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Billups more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Billups

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Billups. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Billups. The network helps show where Daniela Billups may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Billups, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Billups Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Billups links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199986
2 200370
3 200259
4 200655
5 201548
6 200046
7 200241
8 201338
9 200337
10 200924
11 200222
12 200519

About Daniela Billups

Daniela Billups is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (425 citations), Biochemistry (93 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (41 citations), Neurology (74 citations) and Sensory Systems (32 citations). Daniela Billups has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David Attwell, Brian Billups, N. Traverse Slater, Paı̈kan Marcaggi, Gregory A. Kinney, Linda S. Overstreet, R. A. John Challiss, Stefan R. Nahorski, Ioanna Mela and Stephen J. Moss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Neuroscience and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact