Daniel Woolf
Impact in
Papers in
- History 15
- Cultural History and Identity Formation 5
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
- Anthropology 12
- Philippine History and Culture 10
- Co-authors
- Chris Given-Wilson (1 shared paper)Patricia Crawford (1 shared paper)Sara Mendelson (1 shared paper)John Morrill (2 shared papers)Paul Slack (2 shared papers)Norman L. Jones (1 shared paper)Masayuki Satō (1 shared paper)G. E. Aylmer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (5 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)Huntington Library Quarterly (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Woolf
48 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- History 355
- Classics 112
- Museology 53
- Anthropology 144
- Literature and Literary Theory 146
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Woolf. The network helps show where Daniel Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 44 | |
| 5 | The idea of history in early Stuart England | 1990 | 41 |
| 6 | 2000 | 33 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 9 | A Global History of History | 2011 | 28 |
| 10 | 1956 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 13 | The Oxford history of historical writing vol 3 1400 - 1800 | 2012 | 19 |
| 14 | 1985 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 12 |
About Daniel Woolf
Daniel Woolf is a scholar working on History, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (10 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (355 citations), Classics (112 citations), Museology (53 citations), Anthropology (144 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (146 citations). Daniel Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Given-Wilson, Patricia Crawford, Sara Mendelson, John Morrill, Paul Slack, Norman L. Jones, Masayuki Satō, G. E. Aylmer, Antonio Franceschetti and Thomas Mayer. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, Huntington Library Quarterly, The English Historical Review and Optometry and Vision Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.