Daniel Woolf
Impact in
Papers in
- History 12
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
-
- Philippine History and Culture 8
- Co-authors
- Chris Given-Wilson (1 shared paper)Sara Mendelson (1 shared paper)Patricia Crawford (1 shared paper)Paul Slack (2 shared papers)John Morrill (2 shared papers)Norman L. Jones (1 shared paper)G. E. Aylmer (1 shared paper)Antonio Franceschetti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (5 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)Huntington Library Quarterly (2 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (2 papers)Journal of History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Woolf
42 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Classics 81
- History 230
- Anthropology 90
- Museology 31
- Literature and Literary Theory 93
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Woolf. The network helps show where Daniel Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 42 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 6 | The idea of history in early Stuart England | 1990 | 26 |
| 7 | 1956 | 24 | |
| 8 | A Global History of History | 2011 | 21 |
| 9 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 17 | The Oxford history of historical writing vol 3 1400 - 1800 | 2012 | 8 |
| 18 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 7 |
About Daniel Woolf
Daniel Woolf is a scholar working on History, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (81 citations), History (230 citations), Anthropology (90 citations), Museology (31 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations). Daniel Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Given-Wilson, Sara Mendelson, Patricia Crawford, Paul Slack, John Morrill, Norman L. Jones, G. E. Aylmer, Antonio Franceschetti, Thomas Mayer and Masayuki Satō. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, Huntington Library Quarterly, Optometry and Vision Science and Journal of History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.