Daniel Wolff

27 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Daniel Wolff
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
  • Sensory Systems 31
  • Molecular Biology 403
  • Physiology 19
  • Electrochemistry 24
Replace Raif Musa‐Aziz with:
Raif Musa‐Aziz Brazil
Melanie Haas United States
Vereninov Aa Russia
Renée Gobin France
F. Lang Germany
Edward B. Maryon United States
Douglas R. Brandt United States
Wolf-Michael Weber Germany
T. Tønnesen Denmark
C.L. Johnson United States
Daniel Wolff relative to Raif Musa‐Aziz Brazil Raif Musa‐Aziz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Raif Musa‐Aziz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wolff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wolff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wolff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wolff. The network helps show where Daniel Wolff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wolff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Wolff Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Wolff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198799
2 198888
3 198649
4 200241
5 200238
6 199132
7 200031
8 198627
9 200725
10 199522
11 200020
12 200316
13 201216
14 200615
15 200714
16 200510
17 201310
18 199210
19 198210
20 19829

About Daniel Wolff

Daniel Wolff is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Electrochemistry and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (156 citations), Sensory Systems (31 citations), Molecular Biology (403 citations), Physiology (19 citations) and Electrochemistry (24 citations). Daniel Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ximena Cecchi, Osvaldo Álvarez, Ramón Latorre, Ariel Orellana, Anda Spalvins, Mitzy Canessa, Cecilia Vergara, Ricardo Delgado, Casilda V. Mura and Marı́a Inés Becker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Membrane Biology, FEBS Letters, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Cell Biology International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact