Daniel Williams

17 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Daniel Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Linguistics and Language 219
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 299
  • Signal Processing 62
  • Language and Linguistics 54
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 53
Replace Juli Cebrian with:
Juli Cebrian Spain
Cédric Gendrot France
Jessamyn Schertz Canada
Charlotte Vaughn United States
Olga Dmitrieva United States
Bistra Andreeva Germany
Thomas Kisler Germany
Philippe Boula de Mareüil France
Carlo Schirru Italy
Barbara Schuppler Germany
Daniel Williams relative to Juli Cebrian Spain Juli Cebrian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Juli Cebrian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Williams. The network helps show where Daniel Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Williams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201453
2 201650
3 201142
4 201238
5 201437
6 201527
7 202113
8 201812
9
Beyond North American English : modelling vowel inherent spectral change in British English and Dutch
201510
10
Acoustic properties of Dutch steady-state vowels : contextual effects and a comparison with previous studies
201110
11 20149
12 20168
13 20205
14 20164
15
Native and Non-Native Speech Perception
20143
16 20213
17 20161
18 20230

About Daniel Williams

Daniel Williams is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (12 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (219 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (299 citations), Signal Processing (62 citations), Language and Linguistics (54 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (53 citations). Daniel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paola Escudero, Jonathan Morris, Adamantios I. Gafos, Robert Mayr, Ineke Mennen, Jason A. Shaw, Catherine T. Best, Kateřina Chládková, Silke Hamann and Sam Hellmuth. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Language and Speech, International Journal of Bilingualism and Languages.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact