Thomas Ots

577 citations
63 papers · 294 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Ots

33 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Thomas Ots
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 85
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 54
  • Pharmacy 14
  • Social Psychology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 37
Replace Wolfgang Milch with:
Wolfgang Milch Germany
André Haynal Switzerland
Jerrica Farias United States
Seyed Houtan Shahidi Türkiye
Angeliki Bogosian United Kingdom
Christine Yang Dong New Zealand
Marie Sjödin Sweden
Susan L. Sandel United States
Rudolf Gregurek Croatia
Liyuan Huang China
Thomas Ots relative to Wolfgang Milch Germany Wolfgang Milch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wolfgang Milch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ots more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ots. The network helps show where Thomas Ots may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ots, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ots Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ots links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990120
2 201732
3 202027
4
Phenomenology of the Body The Subject-Object Problem in Psychosomatic Medicine and the Role of Traditional Medical Systems herein
199115
5 201514
6 20129
7 20077
8 19917
9 20097
10 20135
11 20174
12 20134
13 20073
14 20013
15 20162
16 20142
17 20102
18 20142
19 20092
20 20142

About Thomas Ots

Thomas Ots is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Social Psychology and Cell Biology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (27 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (6 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (5 papers), Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (85 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (54 citations), Pharmacy (14 citations), Social Psychology (50 citations) and Clinical Psychology (37 citations). Thomas Ots has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Sandner‐Kiesling, Istvan-Szilard Szilagyi, Susan M. DiGiacomo, Diana J. Wilkie, Chang Gyu Park, David Mayor, Judith M. Schlaeger, Michael Lehofer, Florian Beißner and Paul U. Unschuld. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, Acupuncture in Medicine, Revista Internacional de Acupuntura and VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact