Thomas Ots

578 citations
63 papers · 405 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Ots

32 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Thomas Ots
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 148
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 47
  • General Arts and Humanities 5
Replace Hwei Wuen Chan with:
Hwei Wuen Chan Singapore
Hatam Boostani Iran
Leslie V. H. Taylor United States
Barbara Stöckigt Germany
Johanna Carlsson Sweden
Anna Katharina Koch Germany
Michael J. Webster United States
Farnaz Etesam Iran
Carol Y. Francis United States
Hannah Jayne Moir United Kingdom
Thomas Ots relative to Hwei Wuen Chan Singapore Hwei Wuen Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Hwei Wuen Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ots more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ots. The network helps show where Thomas Ots may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ots, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ots Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ots links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990116
2 2017111
3 201735
4 202029
5 201515
6
Phenomenology of the Body The Subject-Object Problem in Psychosomatic Medicine and the Role of Traditional Medical Systems herein
199114
7 20129
8 19917
9 20077
10 20097
11 20134
12 20134
13 20174
14 20013
15 20073
16 20032
17 20092
18 20092
19 20102
20 20102

About Thomas Ots

Thomas Ots is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Cell Biology and History, having authored 63 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (41 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (30 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (17 papers), Medicine, History, and Philosophy (5 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (148 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Psychiatry and Mental health (47 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (5 citations). Thomas Ots has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Sandner‐Kiesling, Istvan-Szilard Szilagyi, Susan M. DiGiacomo, Nenggui Xu, Judith M. Schlaeger, Diana J. Wilkie, David Frederick Mayor, Christian Henke, Florian Beißner and Cem Ekmekçioğlu. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Acupuncture in Medicine, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry and Revista Internacional de Acupuntura.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact