Daniel White

2.1k citations
30 papers · 195 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel White

28 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers

Daniel White
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Anthropology 24
  • Cultural Studies 18
  • Geography, Planning and Development 12
  • Music 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
Replace Warren Motte with:
Warren Motte United States
Jonathan Harris United Kingdom
Thomas Dutoit France
David Bellos United States
James Neil Sneddon Netherlands
Lorna Roth Canada
Lawrence R. Schehr United States
Eleanor Kaufman United States
Mie Hiramoto Singapore
Ghil’ad Zuckermann Australia
Daniel White relative to Warren Motte United States Warren Motte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Warren Motte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel White. The network helps show where Daniel White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel White Line = papers co-authored together Daniel White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 202117
3 202315
4 19729
5 20199
6 20198
7 19957
8 19716
9 19965
10 19795
11 20225
12
The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002: A Potemkin Village
20114
13 20244
14 19714
15 20224
16
Coaching Leaders: Guiding People Who Guide Others
20074
17 20194
18 19884
19 20223
20
The philosophy of the Australian Liberal Party
19783

About Daniel White

Daniel White is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (1 paper), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (1 paper) and Color perception and design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (24 citations), Cultural Studies (18 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (12 citations), Music (5 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (61 citations). Daniel White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hirofumi Katsuno, Patrick W. Galbraith, G. L. Cassiday, Lenny Jones, Thomas Astner, Guido Burkard, Nguyên Tiên Són, Pasquale Cilibrizzi, Martin Rylance and Cristian Bonato. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Cultural Anthropology, Research-Technology Management, Nature Communications and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact