Daniel Weng

34 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers

Daniel Weng
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Physiology 137
  • Cancer Research 71
  • Molecular Biology 294
  • Rehabilitation 25
  • Aging 7
Replace Margaret F. Doyle with:
Margaret F. Doyle United States
David Irvine United Kingdom
Susanne Drechsler Austria
Xian Luo‐Owen United States
Amy Mulick United Kingdom
Heidi L. Miller United States
Li‐Wen Lee Taiwan
Luigi Minerba Italy
Masayuki Nata Japan
J. S. Christiansen Denmark
Daniel Weng relative to Margaret F. Doyle United States Margaret F. Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Margaret F. Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Weng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Weng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Weng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Weng. The network helps show where Daniel Weng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Weng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Weng Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Weng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003170
2 201969
3 201759
4 201555
5 201954
6 201544
7 202037
8 201632
9 199525
10 201725
11 202323
12 201722
13 202221
14 201620
15 202220
16 201620
17 201618
18
Promiscuous recombination of LoxP alleles during gametogenesis in cornea Cre driver mice.
200816
19 201616
20 201915

About Daniel Weng

Daniel Weng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Heat shock proteins research (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (137 citations), Cancer Research (71 citations), Molecular Biology (294 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations) and Aging (7 citations). Daniel Weng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Romania and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter G. Shields, Jo L. Freudenheim, Min‐Ae Song, Theodore M. Brasky, Mark D. Wewers, Winston W.‐Y. Kao, Chia‐Yang Liu, Sarah A. Reisinger, Yuka Okada and Akira Ooshima. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Oncotarget, EBioMedicine, Epigenetics and Cancer Prevention Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact