Daniel Weimar

27 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Daniel Weimar
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Gender Studies 190
  • Economics and Econometrics 210
  • Sociology and Political Science 242
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 4
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace Jonathon Edwards with:
Jonathon Edwards Canada
Mathew Dowling United Kingdom
Argyro Elisavet Manoli United Kingdom
Jo Van Hoecke Belgium
Alana Thomson Australia
Mark S. Nagel United States
Steve Swanson United Kingdom
Andrea N. Eagleman United States
Nels Popp United States
Terri Byers Canada
Daniel Weimar relative to Jonathon Edwards Canada Jonathon Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jonathon Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Weimar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Weimar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Weimar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Weimar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Weimar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Weimar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Weimar. The network helps show where Daniel Weimar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Weimar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Weimar Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Weimar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201937
2 201435
3 201435
4 201333
5 202032
6 201229
7 201428
8 201322
9 201721
10 201917
11 201215
12 202112
13 20169
14 20159
15 20148
16 20217
17 20196
18 20206
19 20215
20 20234

About Daniel Weimar

Daniel Weimar is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Marketing, having authored 29 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (18 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (14 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (14 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), European and International Contract Law (2 papers), Intellectual Property Law (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (190 citations), Economics and Econometrics (210 citations), Sociology and Political Science (242 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (4 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Daniel Weimar has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Wicker, Joachim Prinz, Stefan Szymanski, Christian Deutscher, Rui Biscaia, Brian P. Soebbing, Claudio Rocha, Thorsten Upmann, Kirstin Hallmann and A. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sport Finance, Journal of Sports Economics, Journal of Sport Management, European Sport Management Quarterly and Journal of Business Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact