Daniel Wæver
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
- Surgery top 10%
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Papers in
- Surgery 16
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 9
- Hip and Femur Fractures 6
- Hip disorders and treatments 1
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 4
- Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries 1
- Co-authors
- Rikke Thorninger (17 shared papers)William J. Donnelly (2 shared papers)Lars C. Borris (4 shared papers)Jan Duedal Rölfing (7 shared papers)Martin Lind (4 shared papers)Seth M. Tarrant (1 shared paper)Per Hviid Gundtoft (2 shared papers)Kjeld Andersen (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Daniel Wæver
15 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Rehabilitation 58
- Surgery 273
- Health Informatics 5
- Epidemiology 60
- Internal Medicine 6
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wæver
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wæver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wæver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wæver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wæver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wæver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wæver. The network helps show where Daniel Wæver may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wæver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 6 | Volar plating of distal radius fractures does not restore the anatomy. | 2018 | 6 |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 |
About Daniel Wæver
Daniel Wæver is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (6 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (4 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (1 paper), Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (58 citations), Surgery (273 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Epidemiology (60 citations) and Internal Medicine (6 citations). Daniel Wæver has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rikke Thorninger, William J. Donnelly, Lars C. Borris, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Martin Lind, Seth M. Tarrant, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Kjeld Andersen and Bjarke Viberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Injury, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma and Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.