Daniel Thoma

524 citations
25 papers · 383 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Thoma

23 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Daniel Thoma
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Software 215
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 241
  • Hardware and Architecture 63
  • Artificial Intelligence 234
  • Computer Networks and Communications 97
Replace Sitvanit Ruah with:
Sitvanit Ruah Israel
Nicholas Smallbone Sweden
Diego Garbervetsky Argentina
Amin Shali Iran
Frank Zeyda United Kingdom
Matteo Cimini United States
Stefan Löwe Germany
Daniel Dietsch Germany
Madan Musuvathi United States
Benjamin Delaware United States
Daniel Thoma relative to Sitvanit Ruah Israel Sitvanit Ruah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Sitvanit Ruah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Thoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Thoma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Thoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Thoma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Thoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Thoma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Thoma. The network helps show where Daniel Thoma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Thoma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Thoma Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Thoma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201854
2 201752
3 201838
4 201536
5 201533
6 201331
7 201425
8 201621
9 201215
10 202214
11 201413
12 201310
13 20189
14 20148
15 20096
16 20163
17 20223
18 20193
19 20143
20 20172

About Daniel Thoma

Daniel Thoma is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Hardware and Architecture and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (17 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (9 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (4 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (215 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (241 citations), Hardware and Architecture (63 citations), Artificial Intelligence (234 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (97 citations). Daniel Thoma has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Leucker, Giles Reger, Klaus Havelund, Eugen Zălinescu, Ylìès Falcone, Dejan Ničković, Alexander Weiß, Peter Habermehl, Borzoo Bonakdarpour and Felix Klaedtke. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, Lecture notes in computer science, Journal of Dentistry, Journal of Periodontal Research and IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact