Daniel T. Linger
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Papers in
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 3
-
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 1
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 1
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Debra Skinner (1 shared paper)Jean Lave (1 shared paper)Liisa H. Malkki (1 shared paper)Steven Gregory (1 shared paper)Paul Willis (1 shared paper)Myriam Jimeno (1 shared paper)David Cleary (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Ethnologist (3 papers)Ethos (2 papers)American Anthropologist (2 papers)Anthropological Quarterly (1 paper)Cultural Anthropology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel T. Linger
14 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Anthropology 59
- Sociology and Political Science 175
- Cultural Studies 30
- Demography 35
- Linguistics and Language 11
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Linger
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Linger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Linger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Linger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Linger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Linger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Linger. The network helps show where Daniel T. Linger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Linger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No One Home: Brazilian Selves Remade in Japan | 2002 | 55 |
| 2 | 2001 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 4 | History in Person | 2007 | 27 |
| 5 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 16 | Beyond carnaval : dangerous ritual in São Luís | 1987 | 1 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0 |
About Daniel T. Linger
Daniel T. Linger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Urban Studies, Anthropology and Marketing, having authored 17 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Gender, Sexuality, and Education (1 paper), Urban and sociocultural dynamics (1 paper) and Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (59 citations), Sociology and Political Science (175 citations), Cultural Studies (30 citations), Demography (35 citations) and Linguistics and Language (11 citations). Daniel T. Linger has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Debra Skinner, Jean Lave, Liisa H. Malkki, Steven Gregory, Paul Willis, Myriam Jimeno and David Cleary. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, Ethos, American Anthropologist, Anthropological Quarterly and Cultural Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.