Daniel T. Linger
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 3
- Political theory and Gramsci 1
-
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 1
- Co-authors
- Paul Willis (1 shared paper)Jean Lave (1 shared paper)Steven Gregory (1 shared paper)Liisa H. Malkki (1 shared paper)Debra Skinner (1 shared paper)Myriam Jimeno (1 shared paper)David Cleary (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Ethnologist (3 papers)American Anthropologist (2 papers)Ethos (2 papers)Anthropological Quarterly (1 paper)Bulletin of Latin American Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel T. Linger
17 papers receiving 246 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Anthropology 69
- Cultural Studies 43
- Sociology and Political Science 221
- Demography 43
- Music 12
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Linger
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Linger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Linger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Linger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Linger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Linger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Linger. The network helps show where Daniel T. Linger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Linger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 63 | |
| 2 | No One Home: Brazilian Selves Remade in Japan | 2002 | 63 |
| 3 | History in Person | 2007 | 33 |
| 4 | 1992 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 17 | Beyond carnaval : dangerous ritual in São Luís | 1987 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0 |
About Daniel T. Linger
Daniel T. Linger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper), Political theory and Gramsci (1 paper) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (69 citations), Cultural Studies (43 citations), Sociology and Political Science (221 citations), Demography (43 citations) and Music (12 citations). Daniel T. Linger has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Willis, Jean Lave, Steven Gregory, Liisa H. Malkki, Debra Skinner, Myriam Jimeno and David Cleary. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, American Anthropologist, Ethos, Anthropological Quarterly and Bulletin of Latin American Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.