Daniel T. Bishop

61 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel T. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 594
  • Music 122
  • Social Psychology 695
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 558
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 205
Replace Elizabeth J. Meinz with:
Elizabeth J. Meinz United States
Garry Kuan Malaysia
Gert‐Jan Pepping Australia
Arne Nieuwenhuys Netherlands
J.R. Pijpers Netherlands
Robert Hristovski North Macedonia
Harjo J. de Poel Netherlands
Xavier Sánchez United Kingdom
Diane M. Ste‐Marie Canada
Clare MacMahon Australia
Daniel T. Bishop relative to Elizabeth J. Meinz United States Elizabeth J. Meinz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Elizabeth J. Meinz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Bishop. The network helps show where Daniel T. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201096
2 200791
3 201279
4 202275
5 201371
6 201164
7 201363
8 201860
9 201456
10 201056
11 201349
12 201646
13 201146
14 202042
15 201841
16 201341
17 200940
18 201533
19 201730
20 200626

About Daniel T. Bishop

Daniel T. Bishop is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Music and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (23 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (11 papers), Music Therapy and Health (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (594 citations), Music (122 citations), Social Psychology (695 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (558 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (205 citations). Daniel T. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Costas I. Karageorghis, Robin C. Jackson, Michael J. Wright, David P. Broadbent, Bruce Abernethy, A. Mark Williams, Giorgia D’Innocenzo, Noel P. Kinrade, Daniel Rhind and David-Lee Priest. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sports Sciences, Psychology of sport and exercise, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Journal of Transport & Health and Cognition & Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact