Daniel Smith

62 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Small Animals 323
  • Animal Science and Zoology 226
  • Developmental Biology 29
  • Signal Processing 140
  • Food Science 200
Replace Paul Kwan with:
Paul Kwan Australia
Philip Valencia Australia
David Plets Belgium
Weizheng Shen China
Daihee Park South Korea
Dave L. Swain Australia
Jaakko Mononen Finland
James Hills Australia
Ritaban Dutta Australia
Mark Trotter Australia
Daniel Smith relative to Paul Kwan Australia Paul Kwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Paul Kwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014168
2 2016106
3 201683
4 199765
5 199559
6 201758
7 201357
8 202256
9 201428
10 201427
11 202027
12 202025
13 201225
14 202124
15 201624
16 201722
17 201322
18 201121
19 201417
20 202016

About Daniel Smith

Daniel Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Small Animals, Genetics and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (9 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (8 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (7 papers), Water Quality Monitoring Technologies (6 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (5 papers) and Neural Networks and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (323 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (226 citations), Developmental Biology (29 citations), Signal Processing (140 citations) and Food Science (200 citations). Daniel Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Greg Bishop-Hurley, James Hills, RP Rawnsley, Ashfaqur Rahman, Greg Timms, D. Henry, Ritaban Dutta, Simon Tabrett, Flora D. Salim and Aaqib Saeed. Their work appears in journals such as Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Sensors, IEEE Sensors Journal and Veterinary Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact