Dieter Ebert
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Tadeusz J. Kawecki (4 shared papers)Tom J. Little (12 shared papers)Florian Altermatt (12 shared papers)Christoph R. Haag (20 shared papers)Ellen Decaestecker (7 shared papers)Paul Schmid‐Hempel (1 shared paper)James J. Bull (5 shared papers)Luc De Meester (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Evolution (20 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (19 papers)Journal of Evolutionary Biology (14 papers)Oecologia (13 papers)Molecular Biology and Evolution (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dieter Ebert
287 papers receiving 19k citations
Dieter Ebert's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Ecology 6.7k
- Genetics 8.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.6k
- Insect Science 1.6k
- Parasitology 1k
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Ebert. The network helps show where Dieter Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dieter Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 292 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conceptual issues in local adaptation Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 2979 |
| 2 | Experimental evolution Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 582 |
| 3 | 2007 | 519 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 469 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 454 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 443 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 428 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 392 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 271 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 269 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 261 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 259 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 234 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 227 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 220 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 217 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 208 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 202 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 200 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 179 |
About Dieter Ebert
Dieter Ebert is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology and Insect Science, having authored 292 papers that have together received 19.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (133 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (106 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (75 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (27 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (22 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (18 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (15 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (6.7k citations), Genetics (8.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.6k citations), Insect Science (1.6k citations) and Parasitology (1k citations). Dieter Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tadeusz J. Kawecki, Tom J. Little, Florian Altermatt, Christoph R. Haag, Ellen Decaestecker, Paul Schmid‐Hempel, James J. Bull, Luc De Meester, Katrina L. Mangin and Frida Ben‐Ami. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Oecologia and Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.