Daniel Sheinson

36 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Daniel Sheinson
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Modeling and Simulation 23
  • Cancer Research 65
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 76
  • Infectious Diseases 77
  • Ophthalmology 35
Replace Om Prakash with:
Om Prakash India
Aatish Patel United Kingdom
Andrea Guastalla Italy
FE Alexander United Kingdom
Marco Mariani Italy
Luis Rubio Spain
Adam Lee United States
Javier Louro Spain
Xiucui Han China
Gordon Hay United Kingdom
Daniel Sheinson relative to Om Prakash India Om Prakash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Om Prakash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Sheinson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Sheinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Sheinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Sheinson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Sheinson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Sheinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Sheinson. The network helps show where Daniel Sheinson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Sheinson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Sheinson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Sheinson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 202145
3 201935
4 202131
5 202026
6 202125
7 201420
8 201816
9 202116
10 202216
11 202315
12 202014
13 202212
14 201911
15 201911
16 201911
17 20229
18 20208
19 20218
20 20228

About Daniel Sheinson

Daniel Sheinson is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Epidemiology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (4 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (23 citations), Cancer Research (65 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (76 citations), Infectious Diseases (77 citations) and Ophthalmology (35 citations). Daniel Sheinson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include William B. Wong, Stacey Kowal, Carmen D. Ng, Yang Meng, Jarad Niemi, Craig S. Meyer, Jacqueline McBride, Jorge A. Tavel, Ibrahim M. Abbass and Wendy Meiring. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Advances in Therapy, Neurology, JCO Oncology Practice and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact